Skip to content

Menu

HomeAbout Fred AbramsDivorce & Hidden MoneyPrivate InvestigatorsContact
Phone: 1-212-766-7275
Search
Close

Asset Search Blog

Investigating & Recovering Hidden Money & Other Assets

Published By: Fred L. Abrams, Attorney At Law
Home > Asset Search/Fraud Investigation > Divorce & Hidden Money: Filing Letters Rogatory & Lawsuits Over Offshore Assets

Divorce & Hidden Money: Filing Letters Rogatory & Lawsuits Over Offshore Assets

By Fred Abrams on February 25, 2015
Posted in Asset Search/Fraud Investigation, Divorce & Child Support, Divorce & Hidden Money, Financial Institutions, Hidden Money

This 14th post in the “Divorce & Hidden Money” series focuses on an ex-husband who lived offshore and had not paid child support or spousal maintenance for decades.  In such situations, letters rogatory might be filed to help gather evidence about any assets hidden offshore.  If assets are hidden offshore, another remedy may be filing a lawsuit alleging assets have been fraudulently transferred.

For thirty years the ex-husband in Janet O. v. James O., slip op. 51985 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County, October 17, 2006) had not made one single child or spousal maintenance support payment.  By living in places like Barbados, the Dominican Republic and Mexico, the ex-husband had offshore asset protection and could hinder enforcement proceedings brought for his ex-wife &/or their three sons.  After the divorce, the ex-husband remarried and adopted his new wife’s two daughters.  Meanwhile, his ex-wife and three sons were relegated to a life of hardship, poverty and public assistance.

One of their sons even had to quit college to become a construction worker to support the ex-wife.  Likely to have little practical effect on the absconding ex-husband were: the seizure of New York bank accounts, income tax refunds and lottery winnings; the denial of new and renewed passports; driving license restrictions and the referral of cases for criminal prosecution.  See generally N.Y. Dom. Rel. §§ 244; 244 (a) – (d) & 245, Family Court Act §§454, 458-a, 458-b & N.Y. Civ. Prac. L & R § 5241.  Given the ex-husband’s default for decades, the Janet O. Court did however, indicate it would seek the ex-husband’s extradition.

FILING LETTERS ROGATORY

Although it was not financially feasible for the above-mentioned ex-wife, a letter rogatory, (a.k.a legal assistance request or letter of request), might have helped her situation.  In some cases, letters rogatory can be effective against a divorcing spouse or non-custodial parent hiding assets offshore.  By filing letters rogatory, one may search for secret bank accounts &/or collect financial evidence from witnesses residing offshore.  Letters rogatory are often sought pursuant to The Hague Convention, Taking of Evidence (1970) No. 20.¹  A New York court may issue a letter rogatory to a foreign court as contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 28 (b);  Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(2)(B); &/or N.Y. Civ. Prac. L & R 3018.  N.Y. Civ. Prac. L & R 3108 for example, says:

Rule 3108. Written questions; when permitted. A deposition may be taken on written questions when the examining party and the deponent so stipulate or when the testimony is to be taken without the state. A commission or letters rogatory may be issued where necessary or convenient for the taking of a deposition outside of the state.

SUING FOR FRAUD

Business entities; family members; gatekeepers including attorneys; etc., may hide assets as the nominees, (“intermediaries”), of a divorcing spouse or non-custodial parent. Nominees hiding assets can sometimes be sued for fraud pursuant to New York State’s version of the Fraudulent Conveyance Act codified at N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law  §§270-281.  The Court in Bloomfield v. Bloomfield, 721 N.Y.S. 2d 15 (1st Dept 2001) mentioned this kind of lawsuit over the alleged fraudulent transfer of marital assets.

It may also be possible to join nominees hiding marital assets as “necessary parties” to a pending divorce.  Schmidt v. Schmidt, 472 N.Y.S.2d 26 (2d Dept 1984) (transferees of marital property joined to divorce case); Solomon v. Solomon, 523 N.Y.S.2d 900 (2d Dept 1988).  As the Court has additionally indicated, joining a non-party to a pending divorce can be necessary to prevent the dissipation of marital assets.  See Panish v. Panish, slip op 50881(N.Y. Sup. Ct. Suffolk County, April 15, 2005) (constructive trust imposed on marital residence).  Furthermore, the right to recover an asset might possibly be lost if a nominee or other party hiding assets is not sued at the time of a divorce.

Such was the case in Jackson v. Brinkman, 2006 slip op 50015 (Sup. Ct. Kings County, January 6, 2006), where an ex-husband alleged that a marital residence had been fraudulently conveyed to his former mother-in-law.  The Court in Jackson found the ex-husband was barred on res judicata grounds from seeking a recovery because he had not sued his former mother-in-law as part of his divorce.

¹The Hague Convention Taking Of Evidence courtesy of The Hague Conference On Private International Law.

Copyright 2007-2015 Fred L. Abrams

Tags: asset recovery, bank account search, bank search, offshore banking
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

About Fred Abrams

Fred Abrams
As a member of the New York bar since 1990, Mr. Abrams has handled a wide variety of legal matters in which assets were hidden, such as RICO, money laundering, identity theft and tax fraud. He additionally handled cases in federal court in which his adversaries were Casio Computer Co. Ltd. of Japan; General Motors Corp.; Detroit Diesel Corp; & Lloyds of London.

Read More




Stay Connected

RSS Twitter LinkedIn

Topics

Archives

Recent Updates

  • Did Alex Jones the Infowars Host Hide Money or Other Assets?
  • Divorce & Hidden Money: Concealed Assets & Concealment Schemes
  • One Way To Learn How To Search For Assets
  • 2 Tips For When You Access Your Divorcing Spouse’s Computer
  • Hiding Community Property At A Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

Asset Search & Recovery Resources

  • A Low-Cost Asset Search
  • Assets & Financial Intelligence
  • Forming Shell Companies To Conceal Assets
  • Fraudulent Asset Transfers
  • Illegal Asset Searches
  • Laundered Assets
  • Recovering Assets Hidden Offshore
  • Red Flags For Finding Assets
  • Secreting Assets Without A Border Trace
  • Tax Fraud & ID Theft

Links

  • Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering
  • Basel Committee
  • Belgian Financial Intelligence Processing Unit
  • Caribbean Financial Action Task Force
  • Company Documents.com
  • Financial Action Task Force
  • Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
  • Financial Transactions & Reports Analysis Centre Canada
  • Inter Governmental Action Group Against Money Laundering In West Africa
  • OECD & Tax Transparency
  • SEC Whistleblower Advocate
  • Serious Organised Crime Agency
  • The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units
  • Transparency International
  • U.N. IMoLIN
  • USA Patriot Act Monitor
  • World Bank-AML/CTF

Asset Search Blog

RSS Twitter LinkedIn
Fred L. Abrams, Attorney At Law
31 West 34th Street, Suite 8133
New York, NY 10001
Phone: 1-212-766-7275
Privacy PolicyDisclaimerAsset Recovery LawyersDivorce And Hidden Assets LawyersFinancial Investigator for Divorce In The USA
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING | PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME.
Copyright © 2023, Law Office Of Fred L. Abrams. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo